Intrauterine devices. ReplyMISHELL, D. R; ALVAREZ-SANCHEZ, F.JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association. 1990, Vol 263, Num 2, pp 235-236, issn 0098-7484, 2 p.Article

La planification des naissances : documents destinés aux infirmiers, sages femmes, travailleurs sociaux, instituteurs1986, 11 p.Book

Fifth International Symposium on Intrauterine Devices and Systems for Women's Health, October 27-28, 2006, New York, New YorkSITRUK-WARE, Regine; DONALDSON, Peter.Contraception (Stoneham). 2007, Vol 75, Num 6S, issn 0010-7824, 169 p., SUPConference Proceedings

Intrauterine contraceptive devices : a reappraisalBROMHAM, D. R.British medical bulletin. 1993, Vol 49, Num 1, pp 100-123, issn 0007-1420Article

Effects of various IUDs on the composition of cervical mucusJONSSON, B; LANDGREN, B.-M; ENEROTH, P et al.Contraception (Stoneham). 1991, Vol 43, Num 5, pp 447-458, issn 0010-7824, 12 p.Article

Dispositifs intra-utérinsHOMASSON, Nelly.La Revue du praticien. Médecine générale. 2009, Num 817, pp 157-158, issn 0989-2737, 2 p.Article

Removal of retained intrauterine contraceptive devices in pregnancySACHS, B. P; GREGORY, K; MCARDLE, C et al.American journal of perinatology. 1992, Vol 9, Num 3, pp 139-141, issn 0735-1631Article

La planification familiale : document destinés aux spécialistes des mass médias et au grand public1986, 12 p.Book

What is the fate of the missing intrauterine contraceptive device?IBITOYE, Bolanle O; AREMU, Ademola A; ONUWAJE, Mayomi A et al.Tropical doctor. 2009, Vol 39, Num 4, pp 221-223, issn 0049-4755, 3 p.Article

Sonographic demonstration of an intrauterine device perforating a uterine myomaCASPI, B; SHOHAM, Z; BARASH, A et al.Journal of clinical ultrasound. 1989, Vol 17, Num 7, pp 535-537, issn 0091-2751, 3 p.Article

Migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device into the sigmoid colonAL-MUKBTAX, Rola S; AL-ALI, Jaber A; AMIN, Maher M et al.Saudi medical journal. 2009, Vol 30, Num 4, pp 561-563, issn 0379-5284, 3 p.Article

Emergency contraception. A guide for service delivery1998, 59 p.Book

Contraceptions par dispositifs intra-utérins: indications, contre-indications, risques = Contraception with intrauterine devices: indication, contrindications, risksBLANC, B.La Revue du praticien (Paris). 1989, Vol 39, Num 23, pp 2083-2087, issn 0035-2640Article

IUD insertion forces: effects of recent childbirth and lactationGOLDSTUCK, N. D; HOLLOWAY, G.Advances in contraception. 1988, Vol 4, Num 2, pp 159-164, issn 0267-4874Article

Dr. Lippes and his Loop : Four decades in perspectiveTHOMSEN, R. J; RAYL, D. L.Journal of reproductive medicine. 1999, Vol 44, Num 10, pp 833-836, issn 0024-7758Article

The intrauterine contraceptive device, Multiload Cu 250 : a regulatory problemHALL, R; LONNGREN, T; TYDEN, O et al.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology (Print). 1991, Vol 14, Num 1, pp 41-47, issn 0273-2300Article

Commentary-Lyus R, Lohr P, Prager S. Use of Mirena™ LNG-IUS and Paragard™ CuT380A intrauterine devices for nulliparous women [Contraception 2010;81:367-371]WILDEMEERSCH, Dirk.Contraception (Stoneham). 2011, Vol 83, Num 2, pp 184-186, issn 0010-7824, 3 p.Article

Lost levonorgestrel IUD: diagnosis and therapyNITKE, Shmuel; RABINERSON, David; DEKEL, Arie et al.Contraception (Stoneham). 2004, Vol 69, Num 4, pp 289-293, issn 0010-7824, 5 p.Article

Effect of different types of intrauterine devices on intrauterine activitySAHMAY, S; KALELI, S; ORAL, E et al.International journal of fertility and women's medicine. 1999, Vol 44, Num 3, pp 150-155, issn 1534-892XArticle

A comparative clinical trial of the TCu 380A, lippes loop D and multiload Cu 375 IUDs in IndonesiaSULAIMAN SASTRAWINATA; FARR, G; SITI MOETMAINNAH PRIHADI et al.Contraception (Stoneham). 1991, Vol 44, Num 2, pp 141-154, issn 0010-7824Article

Comparaison du DIU au cuivre T 200 avec et sans fil = A comparative study of the Copper T 200 IUD with or without stringCOHEN, J.Contraception fertilité sexualité (1973). 1987, Vol 15, Num 12, pp 1157-1160, issn 0301-861XArticle

Intrauterine contraception for adolescents aged 14―18 years: a multicenter randomized pilot study of Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system compared to the Copper T 380AGODFREY, Emily M; MEMMEL, Lisa M; NEUSTADT, Amy et al.Contraception (Stoneham). 2010, Vol 81, Num 2, pp 123-127, issn 0010-7824, 5 p.Article

Intrauterine contraceptive device : status reportI-CHENG CHI.Advanced drug delivery reviews. 1995, Vol 17, Num 2, pp 165-178, issn 0169-409XArticle

Health during prolonged use of levonorgestrel 20 μg/d and the copper TCu 380Ag intrauterine contraceptive devices : a multicenter studySIVIN, I; STERN, J.Fertility and sterility. 1994, Vol 61, Num 1, pp 70-77, issn 0015-0282Article

Prolonged intrauterine contraception : a seven-year randomized study of the levonorgestrel 20 mcg/DAY (LNg 20) and the copper T380 Ag IUDSSIVIN, I; STERN, J; DIAZ, J et al.Contraception (Stoneham). 1991, Vol 44, Num 5, pp 473-480, issn 0010-7824Article